Burgman 650 specific.
BurgmanUSA.com
Advertisement
|
by Socal Local » Sat Jun 23, 2012 0:06 00
Ken, Congrats on a tough job well done. How did you end up torquing the secondary shaft nut?
R in OB
-
Socal Local
- Active Member
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2011 10:41 10
- Location: Ocean Beach, San Diego, CA
- My Ride: Burgman 650
- Year model: 2007
- Purchase date: 03 Oct 2011
- Current mileage: 21000
by Ken » Sat Jun 23, 2012 10:01 10
Socal Local wrote:Ken, Congrats on a tough job well done. How did you end up torquing the secondary shaft nut?
R in OB
I wish you had not asked that question as I am sure I will be chastised for the way I did it. But you did ask so I will answer. Per the book, I used blue thread locker and I went into the back of one of my tool cabinets and dug out an old air impact that on a good day will deliver 175 lbs torque at 120 PSI. I set the air regulator at 115 PSI to slightly decrease the torque the impact could give. I held the adapter with a strap wrench and let the impact do the rest. I really don't know the exact torque I put on the nut although I am probably close enough for govt work. Let the flames begin but I'd bet I am very close to spec. I did use a torque wrench to torque the new bolt at 65-70 lbs. That bolt also got a dose of blue thread locker.
Ken
Blue 2003 Burgman 650
-

Ken
- Charter Gold

-
- Posts: 1523
- Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 21:25 21
- Location: Texas, Lake Conroe
- My Ride: Burgman 650
- Year model: 2003
- Current mileage: 0
by Dave_J » Sat Jun 23, 2012 10:12 10
Ken, its to GERMAN spec's, Gutentight. 
"Never mount a passenger car tire on a motorcycle rim; the flat profile of a car tire is incompatible ....."
TOTALLY HOG WASH!!!
SSG/E6 Retired US ARMY Signal Corp. 9th Signal Bn, Forward.
50,000 miles on a CAR TIRE/DARKSIDE.
***TRAVEL STOP***
-

Dave_J
- Insane Poster
-
- Posts: 5507
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 1:05 01
- Location: Auburn WA Where God takes Vacation. ***TRAVEL STOP***
- My Ride: Burgman 650
- Year model: 2008
- Purchase date: 24 Dec 2010
- Current mileage: 37000
by LeDude » Sat Jun 23, 2012 10:25 10
-

LeDude
- Insane Poster
-
- Posts: 4631
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 23:25 23
- Location: USA / West Coast / OR,CA
- My Ride: Burgman 650
- Current mileage: 0
-
by MJR » Sat Jun 23, 2012 10:29 10
I think it's more likely a dealer mechanic would just use an impact rather than a torque wrench anyway.
'09 White 650 my regular ride, Yoshi Carbon/Stainless Exhaust, Bazzaz Z-Scoot Fuel Control '06 Gray 650 new project bike, CVT to fix '05 650 stripped down/rebuilding back up '03 Blue 650 stripped CVT primary pulley splines/failed bearing, fixing and upgrading in process '03 Blue 650 parts bike
-

MJR
- Insane Poster
-
- Posts: 1769
- Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 23:50 23
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- My Ride: Burgman 650
- Year model: 2009
- Purchase date: 28 Apr 2011
- Current mileage: 20700
-
by Socal Local » Sun Jul 15, 2012 13:06 13
Help!!!?/
I dont know what bolt Ken is talking about. There are none on the secondary and my manual and Le Dude say the primary shaft bolt is torqued to 46.5 lb-ft. What is torqued to 70 lb-ft? I am about to torque my primary shaft bolt (on the port side of Suzie) and now I am worried. My manual had the bolt in the wrong place, does it have the torque spec wrong too?
R in OB
-
Socal Local
- Active Member
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2011 10:41 10
- Location: Ocean Beach, San Diego, CA
- My Ride: Burgman 650
- Year model: 2007
- Purchase date: 03 Oct 2011
- Current mileage: 21000
by Buffalo » Sun Jul 15, 2012 13:11 13
46.5 ft-lb is correct for your 07 650. The higher value is for the 03 and 04 models. dangit got that backwards  . 46.5 is for the 03 and 04 models. My manual says 67.5 for the 05 and later models.
--- Craig AKA Cliffhanger---- "Big Red" 2007 Red Executive - 96,679 miles "Little Blue" 2006 Blue 400S - 38,275 miles "STING" 05 B650 gone but not forgotten, RIP My Gallery
-

Buffalo
- Lifetime Member

-
- Posts: 9868
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 15:36 15
- Location: Texas, Terrell
- My Ride: Burgman 650 Exec
- Year model: 2007
- Purchase date: 20 Feb 2007
- Current mileage: 96679
by MJR » Sun Jul 15, 2012 13:29 13
Buffalo wrote:dangit got that backwards  . 46.5 is for the 03 and 04 models. My manual says 67.5 for the 05 and later models.
Yup 46.5 lb-ft for '03-'04 and 67.5 lb-ft for '05-'12.
'09 White 650 my regular ride, Yoshi Carbon/Stainless Exhaust, Bazzaz Z-Scoot Fuel Control '06 Gray 650 new project bike, CVT to fix '05 650 stripped down/rebuilding back up '03 Blue 650 stripped CVT primary pulley splines/failed bearing, fixing and upgrading in process '03 Blue 650 parts bike
-

MJR
- Insane Poster
-
- Posts: 1769
- Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 23:50 23
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- My Ride: Burgman 650
- Year model: 2009
- Purchase date: 28 Apr 2011
- Current mileage: 20700
-
by Ken » Sun Jul 15, 2012 13:37 13
Buffalo wrote:46.5 ft-lb is correct for your 07 650. The higher value is for the 03 and 04 models. dangit got that backwards  . 46.5 is for the 03 and 04 models. My manual says 67.5 for the 05 and later models.
Craig, you scared me for a minute that I may have torqued the wrong value on the 06. I did get it torqued correctly at 65-70 lbs. As a follow-up, my friends bike is doing great and has 700+ miles on it and no issues. We haven't done very much riding for the past few weeks as heavy rains doesn't seem to want to stop.
Ken
Blue 2003 Burgman 650
-

Ken
- Charter Gold

-
- Posts: 1523
- Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 21:25 21
- Location: Texas, Lake Conroe
- My Ride: Burgman 650
- Year model: 2003
- Current mileage: 0
by Buffalo » Sun Jul 15, 2012 14:20 14
Realized it as soon as I posted but it took me a minute to double check the manual and post the correction. Ken you guys have been getting a bit of rain for the last few days  .
--- Craig AKA Cliffhanger---- "Big Red" 2007 Red Executive - 96,679 miles "Little Blue" 2006 Blue 400S - 38,275 miles "STING" 05 B650 gone but not forgotten, RIP My Gallery
-

Buffalo
- Lifetime Member

-
- Posts: 9868
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 15:36 15
- Location: Texas, Terrell
- My Ride: Burgman 650 Exec
- Year model: 2007
- Purchase date: 20 Feb 2007
- Current mileage: 96679
by Socal Local » Tue Jul 17, 2012 0:08 00
I just discovered a posting that the guidance from Suzuki is to replace the primary pulley shaft bolt each time you take it out. After researching "single-use fasteners" on the web it seems to me this bolt does not qualify. Generally you throw away a bolt after one use if it has a special coating (corrosion prevention or threadlock) or it is a TTY (torque to yield) which generally means the instructions are torque it to spec and then add some degrees of turn. One example given was almost humorous:
Here is an example of what occurs when replacing the cylinder head bolts on one vehicle maker’s engine. The steps must be done in a specific sequence and if the sequence is not followed, the bolt can break, causing damage and difficult removal.
The six steps are as follows: 1. Tighten to 40 N•m (30 ft-lb). 2. Tighten an additional 90°. 3. Loosen 360°. 4. Tighten to 40 N•m (30 ft-lb). 5. Tighten an additional 90°. 6. Tighten an additional 90°. These fasteners become misshapen and cannot be reused because of the excess amount of stress that was forced on them during installation
R in OB
-
Socal Local
- Active Member
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2011 10:41 10
- Location: Ocean Beach, San Diego, CA
- My Ride: Burgman 650
- Year model: 2007
- Purchase date: 03 Oct 2011
- Current mileage: 21000
by LeDude » Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:08 12
There are definitely two torque values for this bolt, page 14-45 in the supplemental section for the 05 model has the new torque value for the 05+ models
03/04 models ----> Primary Pulley Shaft Bolt: 64 N-m (6.4 kgf, 46.5 lb-ft)
05+ models -------> Primary Pulley Shaft Bolt: 93 N-m (9.3 kgf, 67.5 lb-ft) ) 05+ models
-

LeDude
- Insane Poster
-
- Posts: 4631
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 23:25 23
- Location: USA / West Coast / OR,CA
- My Ride: Burgman 650
- Current mileage: 0
-
Return to Burgman 650
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
|